City of Los Angeles v. California Towel & Linen Supply Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment on the pleadings rendered against them upon the grounds that their second amended verified answer does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the complaint.
The complaint set forth among other things that the action was brought pursuant to the provision of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (hereinafter referred to as the “code”) relating to the imposition and collection of municipal license taxes. The provisions of section 21.102 of the code with reference to laundry operators were alleged.* 1 And further, that during the years in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States Navigation Co. v. Cunard Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Gilchrist v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Red River Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Virtue Bros. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Marquart v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Mullenaux v. STATE, BY AND THROUGH OR., ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982