Gilchrist v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
This direct appeal is from an order of May 10, 1928,'by the District Court, Southern District of New York, three judges sitting, which authorized an interlocutory injunc tion to restrain appellants — the Transit Commission and New York City — from requiring, or attempting to enforce, further acceptance by the Interborough Rapid Transit Company of a five cent passenger fare over the lines operated by it and from seeking to prevent.a charge of seven cents. This Court stayed the order pending further hearing., The cause has been twice orally argued before us and helpful briefs are on file.
In…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Matter of Quinby v. . Public Service Comm.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Admiral Realty Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- People Ex Rel. City of New York v. . NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Village of Fort Edward v. Hudson Valley Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Moore v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lane v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.