Legal Opinion
Colonial Penn Insurance v. Ennab
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 10, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay the arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated December 6, 1989, which granted the application.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is dismissed, and the parties are directed to proceed to arbitration.
Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, we find that the appellant’s attorney did not act improperly in serving the demand for arbitration upon the petitioner’s Anaheim, California office. The appellant’s policy indicated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Allcity Insurance & VitucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In Re the Arbitration Between Allcity Insurance & VitucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance v. BoisetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & PatryloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Sea Insurance v. HopkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Toffler v. PokornyNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- Eagle Insurance v. Pierre-LouisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- F.W. Woolworth Co. v. Center Moriches Associates Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Mutual Service Casualty v. CedenoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001