Legal Opinion
In Re the Arbitration Between Allcity Insurance & Vitucci
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 24, 1989PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. Assuming without deciding that a stay of arbitration is available (see, CPLR 7503 [b]; Matter of City School Dist. v Tonawanda Educ. Assn., 101 AD2d 1011, affd 63 NY2d 846), petitioner’s application in this case was untimely (CPLR 7503 [c]).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of City Sch. Dist. of the City of Tonawanda v. Tonawanda Educ. Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- City School District v. Tonawanda Education Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by13 opinions
- Barry J. Jacobson, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance v. HancockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. BonillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re the Arbitration between Propulsora Ixtapa Sur, S.A. De C.V. & Omni Hotels Franchising Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Sewell v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.