Legal Opinion
Jakobson v. Chestnut Hill Properties, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1981PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Vincent R. Balletta, Jr., J.
This is an action in which the plaintiffs seek a judgment against the defendant permanently enjoining the defendant from utilizing the existing portions of Dickerson Avenue located in Bayville, New York, for the purpose of ingress and egress to certain subdivision property of the defendant, and further, a declaration that the plaintiffs have a sole and exclusive easement and utilization of Dickerson Avenue, to the exclusion of the defendant.
The answer denies the pertinent allegations of the complaint and seeks a judgment declaring: (1) that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Castle Associates v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- People v. SutherlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Root v. . WadhamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Impastato v. Village of CatskillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Tuscarora Club of Millbrook v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Higgins v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Simon v. PettitSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Wagner v. Crossland Construction Company, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Aszmus v. NelsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- American Nassau Building System, Ltd. v. PressAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.