Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Dunn

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1975No. 7416SC912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The evidence is ample to support the jury finding that the plaintiff executed the deed for his one-half undivided interest in the lands to the defendant with the understanding and agreement that the plaintiff would have the option to repurchase the said one-half interest as alleged. There was evidence that the oral agreement had been reduced to writing in the form of an option to repurchase, which was prepared by the defendants’, attorney and that defendant falsely represented that he and his wife had executed the option, had put it in a safe place and would deliver it to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bateman v. . HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Early v. EleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. McKinley v. HinnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. McNinch v. . Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Ferguson v. . BlanchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCarthy, Lebit, Crystal & Haiman Co. v. First Union Management, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Computer Decisions, Inc. v. Rouse Office Management of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. B & F SLOSMAN v. Sonopress, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API