Nunley v. Loftis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 3. Error from District Court, Beckham County; T. P. Clay, Judge. Action by James ¡M. Loftis against! Thomas J. Nunley. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JONES, O.
This is an appeal from the judgment and decree of the district court of Beckham county, in favor of defendant in error, plaintiff below, James M. Loftis, and against plaintiff in error, defendant below, Thomas J. Nun-ley, in a proceeding for the partition of certain lands in Beckham county, for which joint certificates of purchase were alleged to have been issued by the Commissioners of the Land Office to the parties.
The lands in controversy consisted of two tracts containing about 100 acres each, and were school lands and formerly leased to one- Riggs, who sold or assigned…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chambers v. Van WagnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Coody v. CoodySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Bretch Bros. v. S. Winston & SonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Cook v. WarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Interstate Bldg. & Loan Co. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mays v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Dickson v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Williamson v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924