Legal Opinion
Foresta v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 24, 2009PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGants, J.
The plaintiff, a former safety inspector in the occupational safety department of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority (MTA), appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court affirming the denial by the Contributory Retirement Appeal Board (CRAB) of his application for accidental disability retirement benefits pursuant to G. L. c. 32, § 7 (1), as amended through St. 1996, c. 306, § 14. We allowed an application for direct appellate review filed by the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority Employees’ Retirement Board (retirement board) to consider a question of significance to employers and employees…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Flint v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Sullivan v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Cox v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Massachusetts Medical Society v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- White v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Retirement Board of Stoneham v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Arlington Contributory Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Megiel-Rollo v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- State Board of Retirement v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Parente v. State Board of RetirementMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.