Adams v. Speckman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bell,
The Court below sustained preliminary objections to a complaint in assumpsit on the ground that the complaint failed to set forth a legal cause of action. Three reasons were given for this conclusion: (1) since the action was for the balance of purchase price of a business, it was in legal effect a bill for specific performance and was governed by equitable principles pertaining to specific performance; (2) since a part of the goods in question had been sold, plaintiffs were unable to perform their part of the contract and consequently were not entitled to any…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Waldman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- London v. KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Narehood v. PearsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Taylor v. KaufholdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Phaff v. GernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Clevenstein v. RizzutoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Unger v. Hampton TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Chorba v. Davlisa Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.