Legal Opinion

Adams v. Speckman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1956No. Appeal, 197PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

The Court below sustained preliminary objections to a complaint in assumpsit on the ground that the complaint failed to set forth a legal cause of action. Three reasons were given for this conclusion: (1) since the action was for the balance of purchase price of a business, it was in legal effect a bill for specific performance and was governed by equitable principles pertaining to specific performance; (2) since a part of the goods in question had been sold, plaintiffs were unable to perform their part of the contract and consequently were not entitled to any…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Waldman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. London v. KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Narehood v. PearsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Taylor v. KaufholdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Phaff v. GernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Clevenstein v. RizzutoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Unger v. Hampton TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Chorba v. Davlisa Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API