Monarch Chemical Works, Inc. v. City of Omaha
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.
The defendant, City of Omaha, filed a condemnation proceeding in the county court of Douglas County seeking to condemn certain of plaintiff’s property lying north of Woodland Road, east of 23rd Street, South of “J’’ Avenue, and west of 25th Street, all being within the general area designated as East Omaha. Plaintiff filed an action in the District Court seeking to enjoin this proceeding for the reasons that the property sought to be condemned was to eliminate incompatible land uses and the land to be acquired would be redeveloped for industrial and commercial purposes and that a city is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zurn v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Osborne v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- May v. City of KearneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- David Jeffrey Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Chicago Land Clearance Commission v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Monarch Chemical Works, Inc. v. Governor Charles Thone, Jack Falconer, City of Omaha, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Fitzke v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Greater Omaha Realty Co. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Airport Authority of Greeley v. DuganNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Retail Designs, Inc. v. West Virginia Division of HighwaysWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.