Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Seattle-First National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1972No. 42231PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

This is an appeal from a supplemental judgment of the trial court granting interest on a condemnation award to the defendant condemnees where the condemnation proceedings were discontinued by the condemnor pursuant to RCW 8.12.530.

As a background to the present action, the record shows that after failing in its attempted negotiated acquisition, the plaintiff (appellant), City of Seattle, instituted condemnation proceedings to acquire a 90-acre tract of beach and tideland property at the southerly tip of Magnolia Bluff in Seattle belonging to the defendants (respondents). The city’s largest…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Lake Koen Navigation, Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McLain Land & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Lange v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. LaceyWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Village of Gates Mills v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API