Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph E. Krohn

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 21, 1983No. 82-3262PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:

We are asked to decide as a general matter whether district courts retain jurisdiction over timely-filed motions for reduction of sentence for a reasonable time beyond a lapse of Rule 35’s 120-day period, and if so, whether the district court’s ten-month delay in rendition of the ruling before us was within the bounds of reasonableness. We decline the invitation to retreat from our long-standing construction of the jurisdictional confines of Rule 35. We find that the district court had jurisdiction to rule as it did, and affirm.

I

Joseph Krohn and co-defendants Charles…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Alfred B. Diggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. Pueblo v. Mojica CruzSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1984
  4. William J. Politte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Roscoe Emory Dean, Jr., in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API