Sheldon v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board oE United States General Appraisers. Abstract 28988 (T. D. 32655) and Abstract 29390 (T. D. 32751).
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
In the language of the board's opinion the articles here involved are described as follows:
The merchandise consists of articles of paper lithographically printed, with [which] ’ exhibit in a pictorial manner the outline, form, and mechanical features of either a locomotive or an automobile. The various parts are accurately shown by superimposed paper flaps, arranged in proper order, and which are hinged so that they may be turned back to show the interior mechanism of the machine or engine.
To this description may be added the further statement that upon each main sheet and the various…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Newman v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- United States v. Georgia Pulp & Paper Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Ehret v. PierceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1880
- Taylor v. GilmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
3Cited by13 opinions
- Geeen v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
- United States v. Hudson Forwarding & Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Malmar Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- Winsor & Newton, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- United States v. Buffalo Society of Natural SciencesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.