Legal Opinion

United States v. Hudson Forwarding & Shipping Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 29, 1926No. 2719PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

Paragraph 1431 of the Tariff Act of 1922 contains a provision imposing duty upon

* * * seal, sheep, goat, and calf leather, dressed and finished, other than shoe leather, * * *

at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem.

There is no eo nomine provision for shoe leather in the act, but paragraph 1606 gives free entry to

* * * All leather not specially provided for; * * * leather, cut into shoe uppers, vamps, soles, * * * leather shoe laces, finished or unfinished.

Paragraph 1607 provides free entry for

Boots and shoes made wholly or in chief value of leather.

The only question in the case is whether or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Newman v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. United States v. Georgia Pulp & Paper Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Goldsmith's Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. Klipstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  2. Paramount Import Export Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. Cribari v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938
  4. United States v. SalomonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  5. United States v. Wo KeeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API