Geeen v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kincheloe, Judge:
This is a suit brought by plaintiff against the United States to determine the proper dutiable classification of the imported merchandise. The involved merchandise is invoiced as flax waste for paper making, and was classified for duty as flax noils under paragraph 1001 of the Tariff Act of 1930, at 1 cent per pound, and is claimed to be free of duty under paragraph 1750 of said act, which reads as follows :
Par. 1750. Rag pulp; paper stock, crude, of every description, including all grasses, fibers, rags, waste (including jute, hemp, and flax waste), shavings, clippings, old…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Newman v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- United States v. Georgia Pulp & Paper Manufacturing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Sheldon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
- Midwest Waste Material Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- Malmar Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- Geo Wm. Rueff, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Protest 15245-K of Ecusta Paper Corp.United States Customs Court · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.