Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ross v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1998No. 96-2388PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

One issue is presented: Does claimant have an adequate remedy at law via an R.C. 4123.512 appeal? For the reasons to follow, we find that she does.

R.C. 4123.512 provides:

“(A) The claimant or the employer may appeal an order of the industrial commission * * * in any injury or occupational disease case, other than a decision as to the extent of disability, to the court of common pleas of the county in which the injury was inflicted * * *.

« * * *

“(D) Upon receipt of notice of appeal the clerk of courts shall provide notice to all parties who are appellees and to the commission.
*414“The claimant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Saunders v. Metal Container Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Burnett v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. Ross v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Ross v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Ross v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API