Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Ross v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1998No. 96-2388PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
One issue is presented: Does claimant have an adequate remedy at law via an R.C. 4123.512 appeal? For the reasons to follow, we find that she does.
R.C. 4123.512 provides:
“(A) The claimant or the employer may appeal an order of the industrial commission * * * in any injury or occupational disease case, other than a decision as to the extent of disability, to the court of common pleas of the county in which the injury was inflicted * * *.
« * * *
“(D) Upon receipt of notice of appeal the clerk of courts shall provide notice to all parties who are appellees and to the commission.
*414“The claimant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Saunders v. Metal Container Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Burnett v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Ross v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Ross v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Ross v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999