Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ross v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1998No. 1996-2388PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 411.] THE STATE EX REL. ROSS, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT; M.J. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Ross v. Indus. Comm.,

1998-Ohio-404.] Workers’ compensation—Application for death benefits denied by Industrial Commission—Action in mandamus dismissed when claimant has an adequate remedy at law via an R.C. 4123.512 appeal. (No. 96-2388—Submitted May 12, 1998—Decided July 29, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Saunders v. Metal Container Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State ex rel. Burnett v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Ross v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API