Legal Opinion
Shaw v. DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL CO.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided August 17, 2009No. Civil Action 2:08-0246, 2:09-0134PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN T. COPENHAVER, JR., District Judge.
Pending are two motions for summary judgment, one filed by Trans Aero Limited (“Trans Aero”) on June 19, 2009, and the other filed by Dawson Geophysical Company (“Dawson”) and Heli-Port Drilling, Inc. (“Heli-Port”) on the same date.
I
Plaintiffs Robert and Angela Shaw commenced the first of these two civil actions on April 10, 2008 by filing a complaint asserting claims against Dawson and Trans Aero (the “Shaw action”). Trans Aero commenced the second action on February 13, 2009, against Dawson and Heli-Port, seeking indemnity…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charbonnages De France v. Frank B. Smith, Juanita Smith, Frank Smith, Jr., Smith Brothers Construction Company and Continental Coal Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Eddie Williams v. J.H. Griffin, Superintendent J.C. Harris, Jr., Area Administrator Aaron J. Johnson, Secretary of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Passage Midland Meadows Operations, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2017
- Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Hart High-Voltage Apparatus Repair & Testing Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. Hart High-Voltage etc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Universal Wellhead Services Holdings, LLC v. Harry Berry, et al.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2026