Legal Opinion
Rahr v. Grant Thornton LLP
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided March 8, 2000No. CIV. A. 3:99CV2305GPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
FISH, District Judge.
Before the court are the following motions: (1) the motions of the defendants, Grant Thornton, L.L.P. (“Grant Thornton”), Holland & Knight, L.L.P. (“Holland & Knight”), and Gary L. Rowan (“Rowan”) (collectively, the “defendants”) to dismiss this case for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted; (2) Holland & Knight’s motion to sever and transfer; and (3) the motion of the plaintiff, Stewart Rahr (“Rahr”), to consolidate this case with other cases presently pending in this court. For the reasons set forth below, the defendants’ motions to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Wyser-Pratte Management Co., Inc. v. Telxon Corporation, Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- In Re Heritage Bond LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2003
- In Re Enron Corporation SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Evergreen Equity Trust v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.