Legal Opinion

United States v. John

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 6, 1975No. Nos. 72-1565, 72-1566, 72-1581 and 72-1594PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

Victor Padratzik and Charles Bernstein were found guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. § 19521 and of a conspiracy to violate the statute. Nick John and Steve Lekometros were found guilty of a conspiracy to violate the same statute. Evidence obtained pursuant to Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe *1137Streets Act of 1968 (18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2520) was essential to the government’s case. Thirteen points of error are assigned on review; each will be discussed separately. We affirm.

I. THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF 18 U.S.C. § 1952.

Appellants assert, without supporting argument,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. ChavezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. Larry KnohlCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. Eugene C. Kirk, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Earl Watson, Tony Maxwell and Mae Lillian BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Anthony v. DalyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. Clyde SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. James L. Hodge v. The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API