Legal Opinion
United States v. Earl Watson, Tony Maxwell and Mae Lillian Brown
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 1, 1979No. 77-1575 to 77-1577PublishedCited by 153 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-appellants Watson, Maxwell, and Brown have taken these timely direct appeals from convictions under 21 U.S.C. § 846, conspiracy to commit offenses defined in 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1),1 (distributing or possessing with intent to distribute, etc., a controlled substance) and in 21 U.S.C. § 843(b), (use of a communication facility to facilitate the commission of offenses *1334defined in 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1))2 and from convictions of each appellant of a substantive offense under § 843(b) of such use of a telephone. Appellants’ major contentions are that tape recordings…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Michael BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Herbert SperlingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. BascaroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.