Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Call v. G. M. Sader Excavating & Paving, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1980No. F-79-3 and F-79-9PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnors, J.

This decision is concerned with two cases that have been consolidated for appeal. Plaintiff-appellee, Charles E. Call (hereinafter plaintiff), is the Chief of the Division of Reclamation of the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. The Attorney General of Ohio initiated this matter on his behalf, representing the people of the state of Ohio, in the Court of Common Pleas of Fulton County. The state contended that defendants-appellants, G. M. Sader Excavating & Paving, Inc. (hereinafter the Sader Corporation), and William Joy (hereinafter Joy), violated R. C. Chapter 1514 when agents of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. PettitOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Orr Ditch & Water Co. v. Justice Court of Reno TownshipNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Rochez Bros., Inc. v. DurickaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. State v. WallenOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Widmer v. FrettiOhio Court of Appeals · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Set Products, Inc. v. Bainbridge Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. First Bank of Marietta v. MascreteOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Cleveland v. BrightOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Cleveland v. Paramount Land Holdings, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. In Re Vernon Sand & Gravel, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API