Legal Opinion

Pement v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1959No. 34750PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

In this personal injury action, 2 appellants, husband and wife, plaintiffs below, appeal from a judgment for the defendant upon the' defendant’s verdict, and assign error upon the giving of two instructions and the denial of their motion for new trial upon the same ground.

Appellant wife sued to recover for the damages she sustained as a result of a fall in the respondent’s store in We-natchee, Washington. The complaint alleged that the fall was caused by a slippery spot on the floor which was the result of the respondent’s negligent application of a floor preparation called “Myco-Sheen.” The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Parker v. WomackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Kalinowski v. Y.W.C.A.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Murrell v. HandleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Kitts v. Shop Rite Foods, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Barnes v. Hotel O.Henry Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Payless Drug Stores of Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Brant v. Market Basket Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Cunningham v. Town of TietonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Cooper v. Pay-N-Save Drugs, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Messina v. Rhodes Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API