Legal Opinion

Messina v. Rhodes Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1965No. 37539PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

— This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after sustaining defendants’ challenge to the sufficiency of the plaintiffs’ evidence interposed at the end of plaintiffs’ case.

The trial court also denied plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. The judgment stated as the court’s reasons for dismissal that it had “ruled as a matter of law” that

plaintiffs did not produce substantial evidence to support their claim, and in addition, and in any event, the plaintiff wife was contributorily negligent as a matter of law ....

The action was brought to recover for injuries sustained by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. Payless Drug Stores of Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Kalinowski v. Y.W.C.A.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Williams v. HoferWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Lambert v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Music v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ThorntonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Brant v. Market Basket Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Hughes v. StusserWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Pribble v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Carrieri v. BushWashington Supreme Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API