Marshall v. Safeway, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtWilner, J.
This case began as a dispute over whether twenty-nine dollars and sixty-four cents was wrongfully deducted by respondent Safeway Inc. from the wages of its employee, Bonita Marshall, in response to two writs of garnishment issued by the District Court of Maryland pursuant to Md. Rule 3-646. *545That dispute could easily and quickly have been fully resolved in the District Court garnishment actions. Instead, we have a class action suit that has been in litigation for three-and-a-half years, all but two weeks of which has been after Safeway at least tacitly acknowledged its error, tendered the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Vinole v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Mills v. Foremost InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Friolo v. FrankelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cunningham v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Peters v. Early Healthcare Giver, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Butler v. DirectSAT USA, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Pinnacle Grp., LLC v. KellyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Friolo v. FrankelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.