Legal Opinion
United States v. Hammonds
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 28, 1992No. 2:91-cr-80130PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This criminal action is presently before the Court on Defendant Deondre Hammonds’ Motion to Dismiss his one-count indictment for failure to state a crime. Hammonds contends that, based upon recent federal decisions construing the interplay between federal and state firearms laws, his 1984 Michigan state court conviction for “larceny from the person” cannot be used as a basis for charging him as a felon-in-possession of an firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922, which is the only crime…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fort Stewart Schools v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Calvin CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. James Ray ErwinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Michael Lee DahmsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dushon Hampton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Ronald DriscollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Kirby Lee JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- United States v. BoltonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.