Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronald Driscoll

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 2, 1992No. 91-1583PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

Ronald Driscoll challenges his convictions for being a felon in possession of a firearm and for possessing an unregistered weapon. He raises several issues, the most serious of which involves the question of whether Michigan law fully restores a felon’s civil rights upon his release from prison. We determine that Mr. Driscoll’s rights were not fully restored. We thus register our disagreement with United States v. Dahms, 938 F.2d 131 (9th Cir.1991) and United States v. Gilliam, 778 F.Supp. 935 (E.D.Mich.1991), appeal argued, Mar. 23, 1992 (No. 91-2417), and rule in accord…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Richard CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. James Hassan ElCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. Caron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. United States v. Damon Keith FisherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API