James R. STINSON, Carmeline Stinson, H/W v. KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal by Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (“Kaiser”) from an order denying its motion to dismiss on limitations grounds. James and Carmeline Stinson, the plaintiffs in the district court, filed this suit three years after James Stinson was diagnosed as having pleural thickening resulting from asbestos exposure. The applicable statute of limitations is two years. The Stinsons filed an earlier suit against Kaiser, and 54 other defendants, in the same court, one year after the diagnosis, but the suit was dismissed against Kaiser, pursuant to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lamp v. HeymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Willard v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Sheldon Lovelace v. Acme Markets, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Engel Industries, Inc. v. The Lockformer Company, Iowa Precision Industries, Inc., and Met-Coil Systems Corporation, Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Pa Prison Society v. CortesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Gurfein v. Sovereign GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Jimmie L. Peterson Alonzo Reese v. Bmi RefractoriesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Piazza v. Major League BaseballDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.