Legal Opinion

Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1926No. Docket No. 62PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff is a duly organized and incorporated railway company which is and has been for many years engaged as a common carrier operating its lines in Michigan, Wisconsin, Illinois and other States into which they extend carrying passengers and freight by rail, both in intra- and inter-state commerce. In 1921 the legislature of this State passed the so-called "cab curtain law" (Act No. 139, Pub. Acts 1921 [Comp. Laws Supp. 1922, § 8396 (24)]) entitled:

"An act requiring railroad companies to equip locomotive engines with either cab curtains or vestibule cabs, providing a penalty for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Houston v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  3. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Detroit, Wyandotte & Trenton Transit Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. in Re Certified Question (Midwest Inst of Health VMichigan Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API