Legal Opinion

Isely v. Capuchin Province

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 7, 1995No. 93-CV-74820-DTPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY OF TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF’S PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPERTS

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is presently before the Court on two motions in limine filed by Defendants, one submitted just before trial and one submitted during trial, to preclude or limit the scope of the testimony of Plaintiffs psychological experts, including Dr. Carol Hartman, who is Plaintiffs treating therapist. She is being offered not only as the treating psychologist of Plaintiff Paul Isely, but also as an expert in the area of post-traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”) and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. State v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  5. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Doe v. Archdiocese of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Logerquist v. McVeyArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hilaire v. DeWalt Industrial Tool Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  5. S.M., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. J.K., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API