Legal Opinion

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Federal Housing Finance Agency

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 30, 2010No. Civil Action 09-1537 (PLF)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This Freedom of Information Act matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. 1 Having carefully considered the parties’ papers, the relevant case law and statutes, and the entire record in this case, the Court will grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment and deny plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

The Federal National Mortgage Association, known as Fannie Mae, and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company, or Freddie Mac (collectively, the “Enterprises”), are publicly traded private…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  5. Military Audit Project, Felice D. Cohen, Morton H. Halperin v. William Casey, Director of Central IntelligenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Federal Housing Finance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  2. Reich v. U.S. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  3. Reich v. U.S. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  4. Cause of Action Institute v. White House Office of Management and BudgetDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API