Legal Opinion

Damiani v. Industrial Commission of Arizona

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1959No. 6588PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

Petitioner, widow of Peter Damiani, instituted this claim for death benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. A.R. S. § 23-901 et seq. Respondent, The Industrial Commission, entered an award denying death benefits, which award petitioner asks that we review.

The deceased, Peter Damiani, a 65-year-old cement finisher, worked .a full eight-hour shift on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday during the week prior to his death. At various times during these days, he worked in a kneeling position, supporting his body with his left hand and using a trowel in his right…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hewett v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Lopez v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mead v. American Smelting & Refining CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  2. White v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Edmiston v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API