Legal Opinion

Edmiston v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1962No. 7484PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOCKWOOD, Justice.

This is a proceeding by certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Commission of Arizona which denied petitioner compensation.

Fritz A. Edmiston, the petitioner, was employed by Hughes Aircraft Company from 1954 to May, 1961. He worked as a painter until July, 1958, and was then transferred to work in the blueprint section operating an ozalid machine. Fumes from ammonia used in the ozalid machine processes were constantly present where Edmiston was working. Also, he had to handle a special type of paper on this job, a dye paper called ozalid, which was used in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Mead v. American Smelting & Refining CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Damiani v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hannon v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Theoharidi v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. Dye v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. Dye v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Hahn v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API