Legal Opinion

Lang v. Bowen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1936No. Appeal, 116PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The question before us is whether the policy of life insurance, which had lapsed for non-payment of premiums, had been reinstated prior to the insured’s death.

The motion made to quash the appeal may be considered overruled, as we will dispose of this cause on the main issue involved.

The case has been tried twice, which resulted each time in a verdict in plaintiff’s favor.

The policy in question was issued September 19,1929, upon the life of Harry A. Lang, naming his wife, the plaintiff, beneficiary, and providing for a premium of $1.25 payable the first day of each…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. White v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Iwankow v. Colonial Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Malchinsky v. Mutual Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Gross v. Home Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Fishman v. Eureka-Maryland Assurance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MacKie v. Prudential InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Selby v. Equitable Beneficial Mutual Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Smith v. State Mut. L. A. Co. of WorcesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Barag, Admr. v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API