Legal Opinion
Chidel v. Hubbard
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 2004No. 02-CV-1390, 02-CV-1405PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Associate Judge:
Appellants, Dr. Ira W. Chidel (“Dr. Chi-del”), Wener, Boyle & Associates, P.A. (“Wener”), and cross-appellant, Virginia Hubbard (“Ms. Hubbard”) challenge the trial court’s resolution of the parties’ claims for contribution arising from Ms. Hubbard’s medical malpractice suit. Dr. Chidel and Wener contend that the trial court should have permitted Dr. Chidel to recover a pro rata share of Ms. Hubbard’s settlement with the District, despite his failure to comply with the notice requirements of D.C.Code § 12-309 (2001). Ms. Hubbard, however, claims that neither Dr.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Washington v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Argenbright Security, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Weinberg v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- District of Columbia v. Arnold & PorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Convit v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Owens v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Kennedy v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Burke v. Groover, Christie & Merritt, P.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Townsend v. Eastern Chemical Waste SystemsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.