Legal Opinion
The Corozal
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 15, 1944PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
These are cross suits to recover damages resulting from the collision between the Corozal owned by the Agwilines, Inc., and the Daniel Pierce, owned by the Sinclair Refining Company.
The collision occurred on the evening of August 29, 1942, in the Gulf of Mexico, about twenty miles west of Panama City and some three to five miles off shore. Both vessels were, pursuant to Navy orders, proceeding without lights and under telegraph full speed of approximately 9 to 9Yz knots. The Corozal, a single right-handed screw steel cargo vessel, 348 feet long, 47 feet beam, with a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- The AriadneSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- The OttawaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Dahlmer v. Bay State Dredging & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
- The MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Oriental Trading & Transport Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Pacific-Atlantic S. S. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Petition of United States. The F. S. 231. United States v. Black Diamond S. S. Corporation. The Midland Victory. Hartzell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- William H. McGee & Co. v. the M/V "Nedlloyd Van Noort"District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1991
- Ocean Foods Boat Co. v. M/V ToscaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.