Legal Opinion

Comar Oil Co. v. Sipe

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 20, 1928No. 18448PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASON, V. C. J.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, inverse to their order here.

Prior to the filing of the instant action, the plaintiff, Sipe, and others recovered joint and several judgments in th'e district court of Nobie county against the Comar 0:1 Company, defendant herein, and nine other oil companies for $18,500, growing out of the pollution of Bird’s Nest creek, which flows through th'e Tonkawa oil fields, and through the farms of said parties. Bird’s Nest creek flows through the northeast corner of the 160-acre farm of Sipe, and his recovery therein…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Northup v. EakesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Alfrey v. ColbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Baker v. VadderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Comar Oil Co. v. HackneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lott v. Kansas Osage Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Atlantic Refining Co. v. PackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. DexterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. McKinnisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API