Legal Opinion

Atlantic Refining Co. v. Pack

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 23, 1947No. 31794PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The parties to this appeal will be referred to as they appeared *448in the trial court, wherein plaintiffs in error were defendants and defendant in error was plaintiff.

Plaintiff’s action was for damage to land and loss, of livestock resulting from pollution of streams flowing through his premises. Several errors are alleged for reversal of trial court’s judgment, one being misjoinder of actions. Having concluded that the judgment must be reversed by reason of such misjoinder, we deem it unnecessary to consider the other assignments of error.

Plaintiff is the owner of the southwest quarter of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Northup v. EakesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Walters v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Delaney v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Southern Surety Co. v. Patterson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Comar Oil Co. v. SipeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Radford-Shelton & Associates Dental Laboratory, Inc. v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. NorvellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. McKinnisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. White v. TaylorCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API