Legal Opinion
State v. TWO JINN, INC.
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided March 4, 2010No. 35772PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTE OPINION
THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED FEBRUARY 26, 2010, IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN
GUTIERREZ, Judge.
Two Jinn, Inc. appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion to set aside forfeiture and exonerate bond. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
On December 4, 2007, Two Jinn, Inc. d/b/a Aladdin Bail Bonds/Anytime Bail Bonds (Two Jinn) posted a $5,000 bond for Larry Grant Dana, Jr. who had been charged with failure to register as a sex offender in violation of Idaho Code § 18-8309. When Dana did not appear at his January 23, 2008, pretrial…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Dunlap v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BeardIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. Juventino CarrilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- State v. YagerIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Big Dawg Bail BondsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- State of Idaho v. Allegheny Casualty Company and A-Affordable Bail Bonds Idaho, LLCIdaho Court of Appeals · 2026