Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 16, 1925PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bosrp, 'C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the 'Court.

The question on this appeal is whether a hill will lie at the suit of persons who cut and removed timber from a tract of woodland under contract with one whom they took to be sole owner, to require an interpleader between that one and .another, who later claimed a half interest in the land, and timber, in order to settle the rights of the claimants to half the proceeds of the contract in the plaintiffs’ hands.

Isabella Taylor, since deceased, received by deed in 1896 two parcels of land in Wicomico County separately described in the deed as one…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Carmine v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  2. Board of Education v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  3. North Pacific Lumber Co. v. LangOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  4. School District No. 1 v. WestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Fogg v. GoodeSupreme Court of Florida · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Keiner v. Commerce Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Remsburg v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Tucker v. DudleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  4. Katski v. BoehmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. American Surety Co. of New York v. BrimSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API