Legal Opinion

United States v. WR Grace

District Court, D. Montana

Decided November 22, 2005No. CR 05-07-M-DWMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOLLOY, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

Before the Court is a motion by the United States for an order authorizing the government to initiate ex parte communications with all former employees of Defendant W.R. Grace and Co. (“Grace”). The government contends that such communications are permitted by Local Rule 83.13, which incorporates the American Bar Association (“ABA”) Model Rules of Professional Condhct as well as the Montana Rules of Professional Conduct. Grace argues that ease law interpreting Local Rule 83.13 prevents the government from contacting former employees unless (1) the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Frey v. Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  3. Porter v. Arco Metals, Div. of Atlantic RichfieldDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1986
  4. HARRY A. v. DuncanDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Placer ARCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
  2. Bryant v. Yorktowne Cabinetry, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2008
  3. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Placer ARCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API