United States v. WR Grace
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOLLOY, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
Before the Court is a motion by the United States for an order authorizing the government to initiate ex parte communications with all former employees of Defendant W.R. Grace and Co. (“Grace”). The government contends that such communications are permitted by Local Rule 83.13, which incorporates the American Bar Association (“ABA”) Model Rules of Professional Condhct as well as the Montana Rules of Professional Conduct. Grace argues that ease law interpreting Local Rule 83.13 prevents the government from contacting former employees unless (1) the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Frey v. Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Porter v. Arco Metals, Div. of Atlantic RichfieldDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1986
- HARRY A. v. DuncanDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Placer ARCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Bryant v. Yorktowne Cabinetry, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2008
- United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Placer ARCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015