Legal Opinion

US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Placer ARC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 13, 2015No. 2:13-cv-0577-KJM-EFBPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant Placer ARC d/b/a Placer Advocacy Resources and Choices’ (ARC) Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment. ’ Def.’s Mot. Summ. J., ECF 67. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) opposes the motion. Opp’n, ECF No. 72. The court held á hearing on the matter on January 30, 2015, at which Debra Smith and Ami Sanghvi appeared for plaintiff and Robert Rediger and Candice Rediger appeared for defendant. As explained below, the court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Placer ARCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
  2. (PS) Castaneda v. State of CA DMVDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. Andres Masqueda Serrano v. Rudas, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
  4. Andres Masqueda Serrano v. Rudas, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
  5. Andres Masqueda Serrano v. Rudas, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API