Legal Opinion
Barbeau v. Hoppenrath
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 29, 2001No. 20,922PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CASTILLO, Judge.
{1} Plaintiffs Ronald and Leora Barbeau (Barbeaus) originally filed their personal injury claim (first complaint) against Defendant Kim Hoppenrath (Hoppenrath) and Farmers Insurance Company of Oregon in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon (Oregon federal court) two days before the New Mexico statute of limitations on the claim expired. After the federal magistrate dismissed the suit and denied the motion to transfer venue to New Mexico, Barbeaus filed a second complaint in New Mexico district court attempting to avail themselves of the New Mexico…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garrity v. Overland Sheepskin Co. of TaosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Gathman-Matotan Architects & Planners, Inc. v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- White v. TuckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Gillin v. Carrows Restaurants, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Sautter v. Interstate Power Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Zarr v. Washington Tru Solutions, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Sanchez v. Santa Ana Golf Club, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Amica Mutual Insurance v. McRostieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Brown v. MahdiDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
- Foster v. Sun Healthcare Group, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.