Legal Opinion

Gathman-Matotan Architects & Planners, Inc. v. State

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1990No. 18361PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTGOMERY, Justice.

New Mexico law permits suits against the state for breach of contract, but provides a fairly short statute of limitations (two years) on such claims. NMSA 1978, § 37-l-23(B). In 1984, plaintiff brought such an action against the Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) a few days before the statute ran, and then took no sufficient action to prosecute its claim until the district court dismissed it without prejudice for failure to prosecute. On appeal to this Court, the dismissal was upheld as an exercise of the inherent power of the court to dismiss stale…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Swallows v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  2. King v. LujanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Benally v. PigmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Bracken Ex Rel. Estate of Bracken v. Yates Petroleum Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Perry v. StaverNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ocana v. American Furniture Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Roberts v. BarrerasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Meiboom v. WatsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  4. City of Rio Rancho v. AMREP SOUTHWEST INC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Baca v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API