Legal Opinion
Fogel v. Department of Defense
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 29, 2001No. CV 01-3269 ADSMLOPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
This case marks another chapter in the recurring vestiges of World War II, an event recently referred to as “the defining event of the modern era” (David M. Kennedy, It’s Been Dark Before, N.Y. Times, Oct. 28, 2001, at 14 (Week in Review)).
Mandel Fogel (“Fogel” or the “plaintiff’), a pro se plaintiff, commenced this action on May 22, 2001. In an order dated June 7, 2001, the Court sua sponte dismissed the complaint without prejudice, because it consisted of only two conclusory sentences that failed to provide the defendants with sufficient…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Air India v. BrienDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Fogel v. Secretary of the Air ForceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Fogel v. Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- William E. Frasure , Jr. v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2004
- At & T Corporation v. Coeur D'Alene TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.