Hall v. Sullivan

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

Two proper tions are presented and argued in the briefs in this edurt and are stated in (he brief of plaintiff as follows:

“First. Can the plaintiff maintain this action against the defendant, R. L. Sullivan, as liquidating agent of the Security State Bank -of Healdt-on, Okla., or is the plain-tiff’s cause of action one against the state and, therefore, not maintainable without the state’s consent?

“Second. Does the plaintiff’s peti’ion set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant and entine the plaintiff to a payment of this ela’m in…