Murphy v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge
Introduction
Travis Murphy (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.0351 motion without an evidentia-*878ry hearing. Movant claims that the motion court erred in denying his request for post-conviction relief because plea counsel was ineffective for failing to reach a plea agreement with the State for a more lenient sentence and the plea court erroneously enhanced his stealing offense from a misdemeanor to a felony. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
This case involves convictions stemming from three separate crimes to which Mov-ant…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morrow v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- State of Missouri v. Amanda N. BazellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- Weeks v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Wilkins v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Routt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. EvansMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Borneman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Burkhalter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Morrison v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021