Legal Opinion

State v. Nab

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1987No. 16351, 16670PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Justice.

Following a jury verdict of guilty, a judgment of conviction was entered against Randy Nab for the felony crime of escape. His subsequent application for post-conviction relief — alleging his conviction for escape was not supported by the facts presented at trial — was denied by the trial court. Nab timely appealed both from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying post-conviction relief. The appeals have been consolidated before us for disposition. Construing the statute under which Nab was charged with escape, I.C. § 18-2506, in light of the evidence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. PruettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Worley Highway District v. Kootenai CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In re CulverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. McKaughenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HarringtonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. SwisherIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. DeitzIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. DeitzIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. HarringtonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API