Legal Opinion

Burrow v. McMahan

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1964No. A-10128PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice.

This action in trespass to try title was instituted by James W. McMahan et al., respondents, to recover certain severed mineral interests in Foard County. Judgment was rendered in favor of respondents after a trial to the court on an agreed statement of facts, and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. 376 S.W.2d 850. As the case reaches this Court, the rights of the parties turn upon whether the attack made by respondents on a substitute trustee’s deed executed in 1937 is barred by Article 5523a, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Civ.Stat. We hold that the statute does not apply where, as here,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hart v. McCluskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Dall v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Johnson v. KoenigCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Campsey v. Jack County Oil & Gas AssociationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Burrow v. McMahanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maeberry v. Gayle, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  2. Calverley v. GunstreamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. AMERICAN SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N OF HOUSTON v. MusickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Parsons v. WatleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Shamburger v. Conoco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API