Legal Opinion

State v. Compton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1988No. 8728SC975PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s failure to grant his motion to dismiss at the close of all the evidence, arguing that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction.

Obtaining property by false pretenses is defined as (1) a false representation of a past or subsisting fact or a future fulfillment or event, (2) which is calculated and intended to deceive, (3) which does in fact deceive, and (4) by which the defendant obtains or attempts to obtain anything of value from another person. State v. Cronin, 299 N.C. 229, 242, 262 S.E. 2d 277, 286 (1980); G.S.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. AgnewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. United States v. John O'BOyleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. WalstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. CravenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. BraswellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API